<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lackhead.org &#187; The Way The World Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lackhead.org/category/the-way-the-world-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lackhead.org</link>
	<description>The irascible ramblings of some guy named Chad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange and the philosophy of Wikileaks</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2010/11/julian-assange-and-the-philosophy-of-wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2010/11/julian-assange-and-the-philosophy-of-wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julian assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a shout out in regards to a well-written and fascinating article on the subject of Julian Assange and the philosophy of Wikileaks. Very much worth the time to read. -c]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a shout out in regards to a well-written and fascinating article on the subject of <a href="http://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/julian-assange-and-the-computer-conspiracy-%E2%80%9Cto-destroy-this-invisible-government%E2%80%9D/#">Julian Assange and the philosophy of Wikileaks</a>.  Very much worth the time to read. </p>
<p> -c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2010/11/julian-assange-and-the-philosophy-of-wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A 21st Century Approach to Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/12/a-21st-century-approach-to-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/12/a-21st-century-approach-to-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science/Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wonderfulness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A single sperm has 37.5MB of DNA information in it. That means that a normal ejaculation represents a data transfer of 1,587.5TB. &#8211; from Reddit Of course, one could claim that the majority of that is duplicate data, so really &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2009/12/a-21st-century-approach-to-sex/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
A single sperm has 37.5MB of DNA information in it. That means that a normal ejaculation represents a data transfer of 1,587.5TB.
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8211; from <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/afpez/a_single_sperm_has_375mb_of_dna_information_in_it/">Reddit</a></p>
<p>Of course, one could claim that the majority of that is duplicate data, so really the transfer rate is much lower, with lots of effort to make sure the data is not lost.   It&#8217;s also encoded information, so with the right algorithm one could decode it and get a <em>lot</em> more data out of it.  Of course, one usually doesn&#8217;t think of a fertile woman and 18 years of child-rearing as an algorithm, but there you have it. </p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/12/a-21st-century-approach-to-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Citibank, I break with thee, I break with thee, I break with thee.</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/11/dear-citibank-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/11/dear-citibank-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politco Schmolitico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuck you]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received a letter from Citibank informing me that, &#8220;in order to provide our customers with access to credit, we have had to adjust our pricing.&#8221; Uh-huh. Do we need to talk about the billions you&#8217;ve received of ourmoney, &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2009/11/dear-citibank-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I received a letter from Citibank informing me that, &#8220;in order to provide our customers with access to credit, we have had to adjust our pricing.&#8221;  Uh-huh.  Do we need to talk about the billions you&#8217;ve received of <em>our</em>money, you fucks?  Do we need to talk about how messed up a 29.99% APR is? </p>
<p>16 years ago I got my account with you, and it took me 10 minutes waiting on hold to break that relationship. Good bye, and good riddance.  You won&#8217;t be seeing my business ever again.   </p>
<p>Piss off and die, you financial rapists. </p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/11/dear-citibank-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee-i-break-with-thee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hotmail must die, take #2</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/06/hotmail-must-die-take-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/06/hotmail-must-die-take-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer-schmuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dkim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey blogosphere- Just a quick update to an old article on Why Hotmail Must Die- today our mail servers at work got hit with the lovely Hammer &#8216;o Hotmail and all email from our domain to any Microsoft email server &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2009/06/hotmail-must-die-take-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey blogosphere-</p>
<p>   Just a quick update to an old article on <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/hotmail-must-die/">Why Hotmail Must Die</a>- today our mail servers at work got hit with the lovely Hammer &#8216;o Hotmail and all email from our domain to any Microsoft email server (hotmail.com, msn.com, MS Live, etc) is now being rejected.  Not that it is exactly the same as the predicament I found myself in last year, but similar enough that I decided to play around and implement <a href="http://www.dkim.org/">DKIM</a> at home to see if that made any difference in deliverability from my domain to Hotmail.  All testing was done with <a href="http://www.openspf.org/">SPF</a> records in place, FYI. Here are the results:</p>
<ol>
<li>No DKIM, no rewriting of headers</ul>
<p> <strong>Result:</strong> email sent from my domain to hotmail.com addresses would just disappear&#8230;or if you were lucky would wind up in the Junk folder.</li>
<li>DKIM, no rewriting of headers</ul>
<p> <strong>Result:</strong> email sent from my domain to hotmail.com addresses would just disappear&#8230;or if you were lucky would wind up in the Junk folder.</li>
<li>DKIM/No DKIM, but postfix configured to nuke any <em>User-Agent:</em> header and to set the <em>X-Mailer:</em> header to read <em>Microsoft Office Outlook 11</em></li>
<p>  <strong>Result:</strong> email sent from my domain to hotmail.com addresses would arrive just fine.</li>
</ol>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the conclusion my fine friends?   Well, industry-standard anti-spam measures like <a href="http://www.openspf.org/">SPF</a> or <a href="http://www.dkim.org/">DKIM</a> seem to have no affect on mail delivery to hotmail.com address. However, telling Microsoft that I&#8217;m using their product seems to do the trick.  Is there any doubt left that Microsoft&#8217;s main business model is bullying? </p>
<p>Somehow, I don&#8217;t think this is going to do the trick at work, but hey, it is at least worth a shot. If anything interesting pops up I&#8217;ll let y&#8217;all know. </p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2009/06/hotmail-must-die-take-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the wilderness</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/welcome-to-the-wilderness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/welcome-to-the-wilderness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politco Schmolitico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biting humor of Tom Toles from The Washington Post&#8230; -c]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biting humor of Tom Toles from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">The Washington Post</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><CENTER><img src="/images/toles_gop_desert.gif" alt="GOP- Welcome to the Wilderness" /></CENTER></p>
<p>          -c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/welcome-to-the-wilderness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once more unto the breach, dear friends</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/once-more-unto-the-breach-dear-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/once-more-unto-the-breach-dear-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer-schmuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diebold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our English dead! In peace there&#8217;s nothing so becomes a man As modest stillness and humility; But when the blast of war blows in our &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/once-more-unto-the-breach-dear-friends/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more,<br />
Or close the wall up with our English dead!<br />
In peace there&#8217;s nothing so becomes a man<br />
As modest stillness and humility;<br />
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,<br />
Then imitate the action of the tiger:<br />
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood.<br />
&#8230;show us here<br />
The mettle of your pasture; let us swear<br />
That you are worth your breeding; which I doubt not.</p>
<div style="text-align: right;"><EM>&#8211; Shakespeare, from Henry V</EM></div>
</blockquote>
<p><P><br />
Well, Mr. Obama, you have my vote. Use it well. May you ride this groundswell and help tip our country, poised so precariously, towards a better future.<br />
<P></p>
<div style="text-align: center;">-c</div>
<p><P><br />
ps- I had an interesting moment this morning while voting. When I was done I asked to speak to the head electiony-dude at my voting place so that I could complain about the Deibold machines being used (yay for Utah).  As soon as I started speaking he rolled his eyes and said, &#8220;You and me both, my friend.&#8221;  We had a short, but heartwarming conversation about our fears, not of a computerized election, but of a <EM>poorly</EM> and <EM>secretly</EM> computerized election.  Please, dear readers, remind me to get involved in local elections, not for running for office, but running elections. This good man I met this morning could use some help in doing the right thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/11/once-more-unto-the-breach-dear-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Image of the day: Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/10/image-of-the-day-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/10/image-of-the-day-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, please, people. This is a credit crisis, not a stock crisis, and perhaps we should focus on addressing those issues, not just bailing out Wall Street. Wall Street is not the same as the American financial market, or the &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2008/10/image-of-the-day-wall-street/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/jumpyoufuckers.jpg" alt="Jump You Fuckers" /></p>
<p>Please, please, people.  This is a <em>credit</em> crisis, not a stock crisis, and perhaps we should focus on addressing those issues, not just bailing out Wall Street.  Wall Street is <em>not the same</em> as the American financial market, or the credit industry. </p>
<p><sigh> </p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/10/image-of-the-day-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My success in Scientology</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/my-success-in-scientology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/my-success-in-scientology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religiosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I stumbled across the unveiling of a new search engine, called Cuil (pronounced &#8220;cool&#8221;). It started up recently as a challenger to Google&#8217;s search domination, and has taken a very different tack towards processing data out there on the &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/my-success-in-scientology/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I stumbled across the unveiling of a new search engine, called <a href="http://http://www.cuil.com/info/">Cuil</a> (pronounced &#8220;cool&#8221;).  It started up recently as a challenger to Google&#8217;s search domination, and has taken a very different tack towards processing data out there on the Interwebs. You can cuil for &#8220;cuil&#8221; if you want to find out more about it (or you can google it, if you&#8217;re out of touch.  I mean, googling things is so yesterday!).  For me though, my first test of this new search engine was to indulge in the ubiquitous narcissistic query, and when &#8220;chad lake&#8221; didn&#8217;t turn much up, I tried searching for &#8220;lackhead&#8221; and got this result:</p>
<p><img src="/images/lackhead_Cuil_results.png" alt="Lackhead Cuil results" /></p>
<p>As you can see, Cuil was able to somehow dig out my deep connections with Scientology, despite the fact that I have never gone to a meeting, never read any Scientology materials, and as far as I know am not on the &#8220;bridge to total freedom&#8221;.  While it might have been due to having read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_Earth_(novel)">Battlefield Earth</a> back when I was 13, I&#8217;d rather like to think that Cuil has stepped up the ante and is now reading and archiving every human&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Thetan">OT level</a>, and obviously I&#8217;m scoring pretty high. </p>
<p>So, at least I&#8217;ve got that going for me. Chad 1, Xenu 0.</p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/my-success-in-scientology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A French approach to North American geography</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/a-french-approach-to-north-american-geography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/a-french-approach-to-north-american-geography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is wrong with this picture? -c]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photos.lackhead.org/2008_Tours/P1010333.JPG"><img class="ZenPress_thumb " alt="P1010333" title="P1010333" src="http://photos.lackhead.org/zen/i.php?a=2008_Tours&amp;i=P1010333.JPG&amp;w=360&amp;h=480"  /></a></p>
<p>What is wrong with this picture?</p>
<p>-c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/07/a-french-approach-to-north-american-geography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day: fearmongering</title>
		<link>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/quote-of-the-day-fearmongering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/quote-of-the-day-fearmongering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lackhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Way The World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordswordswords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/quote-of-the-day-fearmongering/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now one of Clinton&#8217;s Laws of Politics is this: If one candidate&#8217;s trying to scare you and the other one&#8217;s trying to get you to think; if one candidate&#8217;s appealing to your fears and the other one&#8217;s appealing to your &#8230; <a href="http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/quote-of-the-day-fearmongering/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Now one of Clinton&#8217;s Laws of Politics is this: If one candidate&#8217;s trying to scare you and the other one&#8217;s trying to get you to think; if one candidate&#8217;s appealing to your fears and the other one&#8217;s appealing to your hopes, you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope. That&#8217;s the best.</p>
<div style="text-align: right;"><em>&#8211; Bill Clinton, 2004</em></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Huh, given the tenor of Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign these days, I have a feeling this new Clinton is writing her own rules. Me?  I support what Bill said back in 2004, which is why I am <strong>not</strong> voting for fear-mongering Hillary. </p>
<p>-c</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZW0m2nWB_M&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZW0m2nWB_M&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lackhead.org/2008/04/quote-of-the-day-fearmongering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

